Comparing and contrasting help us discover subtle and/or
hidden differences and similarities between two subjects. Comparisons also help
us create analogies of seemingly unrelated subjects. For example, Mary Roach
compares being dead to being on a cruise ship since in both instances, the
individual is lying on his back in endless relaxation. Had it not been for this
analogy, the similarity between death and being on a cruise would not have been
noticed. Furthermore, we can learn about a subject that we are not familiar
with by comparing it to something that is familiar to us.
In “The
Meaning of Life”, Roger Cohen compares two rhesus monkeys with different
lifestyles. There is Canto, who is on a restricted diet, and Owen, who is
allowed to eat whatever he pleases. Both monkeys are part of an experiment about
the causes of aging conducted by a team from the University of Wisconsin. Cohen
reports, “While just 13 percent of the dieting group has died in ways judged
due to old age, 37 percent of the feasting monkeys are already dead” (291). As
shown by the experiment, monkeys on a restricted diet lived longer than those
who ate freely. Cohen and other scientists challenge this finding since it should not the quantity of life that matters, but the quality of life. Owen may die
sooner than Canto, but unlike Canto, who is not really living at all, Owen will
die happily, knowing that he has lived his life to the fullest. Cohen goes on
to compare the demeanor of both Canto and Owen, “Canto looks drawn, weary,
ashen, and miserable…Owen, by contrast, is a happy camper with a wry smile”
(292). Just by looking at Canto, one can easily tell that he is not happy and
would much rather be taken out of his misery. On the other hand, Owen has
obtained the chief good in life, happiness.
Cohen
focuses more on differences between the two monkeys. Cohen goes into
descriptive detail when mentioning the physical differences between the two
monkeys. He also emphasizes the difference in quantity and quality of life
between Canto and Owen.
Cohen argues
it does not matter how long you live to if you are miserable the whole time. The allure of life is the fragility of it; no one knows when his or her time is up
and it is important to live everyday to the fullest (293).
I agree with
Cohen. It is important for people to find happiness in life, whether they
obtain it from their job or the food they eat. It is especially upsetting to
see people work at jobs that they absolutely loathe. Those jobs may be reliable
sources of income, but if the person gets no satisfaction out of the job, does
the money even matter? It may be a risk chasing after your dreams, but as
Hershel Greene puts it, “You step outside, you risk your life. You take a
drink of water, you risk your life…The only thing you can choose is what you’re
risking it for.” Life is all about taking chances and if you don’t take a
chance, life will pass you by and before you know it, you will die and the real
issue will be whether you lived at all.
No comments:
Post a Comment